An American study by L.R. Feldstein et al titled “Protection From COVID-19 Vaccination and Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Children Aged 6 Months–4 Years, United States, September 2022–April 2023” published on 5 December 2024 confirms that the COVID-19 “vaccines” are worse than useless for children.
The paper is short at merely 7 pages in total; about three pages are tables so there isn’t that much to read.
The study involves children aged 6 months to 4 years living in Washington, Oregon, Michigan, Arizona and Utah. The study period is from 1 September 2022 to 30 April 2023.
There were 614 participants, 306 (49.8%) male and 308 (50.2%) female. By the end of the study period, 175 (28.5%) were unvaccinated. The study tested for infection and symptomatic infection based on the PCR test.
Interestingly, among participants without evidence of prior infection, those vaccinated with Pfizer-BioNTech were more likely to have SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 compared to those who were naïve and unvaccinated.
Well, that is interesting.
Table 2 on pages 4 and 5 is also quite interesting. A few points regarding those who had symptomatic infection:
Compared to the unvaccinated, the vaccinated (2 doses of Moderna or 3 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech) has an adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) of 1.61 (0.65, 4.03).
Compared to the unvaccinated, the vaccinated <60 days has an adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) of 1.34 (0.36, 5.04).
Compared to the unvaccinated, the vaccinated >= 60 days has an adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) of 1.72 (0.69, 4.32).
Compared to the unvaccinated, the Moderna vaccinated days has an adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) of 0.91 (0.31, 2.69).
Compared to the unvaccinated, the Pfizer vaccinated days has an adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) of 2.91 (1.12, 7.53).
I am not an expert but when the hazard ratio is >1, it begs the question of the efficacy of the so-called vaccines. Granted, the 95% CI are wide but still… one has to wonder.
Be sure to subscribe to our mailing list so you get each new Opinyun that comes out!
Comentarios